Students visiting this page for the first time should read through the entire syllabus: the course description, the course requirements, and the course outline. Beyond this initial reading, this web-based syllabus is designed to be used throughout the semester. Below you will find links to the assignments for each class session. Where possible, reading assignments have been linked to electronic versions available on the Internet. Other readings can be found under the "Materials" section of the Yale "classes" server. You will also find many other useful items on the Yale classes server, such as class notes and data. If you have any questions or comments about the web page or the course, please contact me.
[ Course description ] [ Requirements ] [ Course Outline ] [ Contact Instructor ]
Important Dates:
Sept. 19: Research question due
Oct. 24: Outline of research project due
Dec. 8: Draft of paper due
9/12
9/19
9/26
10/3
10/10
10/17
10/24
10/31
11/7
11/14
11/28
12/5
[Top]
Course
description
This year long senior seminar is the capstone of the International
Studies Major. Students are expected to apply the skills and
substantive knowledge they have acquired from the required courses of
the major to do research on a question pertaining to international
studies. The skills include the ability to do research in foreign
languages, formal analytical tools from micro and macroeconomics, and
statistical analysis.
This is a research-oriented
seminar. It assumes that you have background and interest in a topic in
international studies. The purpose of this course is to teach you how
to conduct research in your area of interest. Thus, you should come to
this class with a research question. This course provides the
opportunity of in depth research on your question – with the assistance
of your colleagues in the class.
The substantive topic for this senior seminar is international
cooperation. This course addresses why governments enter into
international arrangements and with what effects. We will study the
effects of these arrangements on measures of material well-being such
as economic growth and the environment. We will also look at the effect
of international arrangements on measures of stability such as regime
transition.
How does one assess the effectiveness of international arrangements?
The answer eludes straightforward observation. What one observes in the
world are not random experiments. Governments enter into international
agreements under certain conditions. Outcomes are the result of both
the effects of international arrangements and of these conditions. One
must be able to identify what part of the outcome should be attributed
to selection and what part to performance.
Hence, before answering questions about the effects of international
agreements, we must first address the question of why governments enter
into these agreements in the first place.
While the questions of selection and performance are interconnected and
we will address both in this course, students may prefer to focus on a
selection question (why governments enter into international
arrangements) or focus on a performance question (what are the effects
of international arrangements) for their research project. Projects may
be broadly theoretical, or narrowly descriptive (or anything in
between). Substantively, students may choose to focus on any number of
different international arrangements (e.g., IMF or World Bank
arrangements, alliances or treaties, or trade agreements such as the
WTO). With permission, students may also pursue a research topic
outside of the area of international arrangements, provided it fits
within the broader framework of international studies.
We will approach research questions from 3 methodological perspectives:
(1) formal theory (2) large-n empirical work (3) case study empirical
work.
• Students who have taken some game theory or formal
modeling are encouraged to try their hand at formal approaches to
research questions. (Recall what you learned in Econ 115 & 116.)
• Students who have statistical training are
encouraged to do large-n empirical work. Data will be made available to
the class. (Recall what you learned in Stat 102.)
• Students who prefer case study work should choose
their cases analytically by considering different “types” of cases that
a question identifies. Once the “type” of case is identified, the
student can refer to data to learn which country exemplifies the type
the student wishes to explore. (Here your linguistic skills can be
used. Group courses also may be helpful.)
• Students interested in a particular country or
region must also reference the larger database to gain an understanding
of where their particular case lies in the broader distribution of
cases. Such students should use the data set to identify other cases
similar to the one that interests them, as well as counterfactual
cases. (Language skills and Group courses.)
Course Outline
Week 1 (9/12/06): Introduction
PLAN OF RESEARCH:
• Start with a RESEARCH
QUESTION
• Review the literature
• Propose an answer to your question
• Find the data
• Selection analytically significant cases
• Analysis of data
• Draw conclusions
How do we select case studies?
READ:
Vreeland,
James Raymond. 2003. Why do governments and the IMF enter into
agreements: Statistically selected case studies. International
Political Science Review: Special Issue on The Political Economy of
International Finance 24(3): 321-343.
ASSIGNMENT:
Choose an analytically significant case with respect to your research
question. Explain why it is signficant.
Week 2 (9/19/06): The selection
problem in international relations
ASSIGNMENT: In
your research, do you face a selection problem? What are the potential
determinants of selection?
Week 3 (9/26/06): Why do governments enter into international arrangements?
Raustiala,
Kal.
Form and Substance in International Agreements. The American Journal of
International Law Vol. 99, No. 3 (Jul., 2005), pp. 581-614.
[Top]
Week 4 (10/3/06): Stata session on entering into international arrangements
CAT Selection: Why Governments enter into the UN Convention Against Torture.
The
Institutional Determinants of IMF Programs.
The International and Domestic Politics of IMF Programs.
ASSIGNMENT: Following on the
assignment from Week 2, test whether there is indeed a correlation
between the variable(s) you proposed and selection.
Week 5 (10/10/06): Foreign Aid
William
Easterly. Debt Relief. Foreign Policy, No. 127. (Nov. - Dec., 2001),
pp. 20-26.
William
Easterly. Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth? The Journal of Economic
Perspectives Vol. 17, No. 3 (Summer, 2003), pp. 23-48.
Karen
L. Remmer. Does Foreign Aid Promote the Expansion of Government?
American Journal of Political Science Vol. 48, No. 1 (Jan., 2004), pp.
77-92.
Suggested background: Diamond, Jared. 1999. Guns, Germs, and Steel:
The Fates of Human Societies.
New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
[Top]
Week 6
(10/17/06): Stata session on the effects of international
arrangements
[Top]
Week 7 (10/24/06):International cooperation and human rights
Hathaway,
Oona A. 2003. The Cost of Commitment. Stanford Law Review 55: 1821-62.
CIRI Human Rights
Data Project
Week 8 (10/31/06): United Nations
Security Council
Luck,
Edward C. 2006. The UN Security Council: Practice & Promise. New
York: Routledge.
Voeten,
Eric. Why no UN Security Council Reform?: Lessons for and from
Institutionalist Theory.
Week 9 (11/7/06): Nuclear Proliferation
Week 10 (11/14/06): Democracy,
Development, and Diffusion
Pevehouse
Jon C. 2002a. With a Little Help from My Friends? Regional
Organizations and the Consolidation of Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science
46: 611-26.
Pevehouse,
Jon C. 2002b. Democracy from the Outside-In? International
Organizations and Democratization. International
Organization 56: 515–549.
Przeworski,
Adam and Fernando Limongi. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” World Politics 49. Pages 155-183.
Ward,
Michael D., John O'Loughlin, Jordin S. Cohen, Kristian S. Gleditsch,
David S. Brown, David A. Reilly, Corey L. Lofdahl, & Michael E.
Shin. 1998. The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946-1994. Annals of the Association of American
Geographers 88: 545-74.
Simmons,
Beth and Zachary Elkins. 2004.The Globalization of Liberalization:
Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review
98 (1): 171-189.
Week 11 (11/28/06): The IMF and the
World Bank
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Week 12 (12/5/06): Setting the research agenda for next semester and review
James Raymond Vreeland
Associate Professor, Department
of Political Science
email: james.vreeland@yale.edu
web: http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/jrv24/
tel: 203-432-6220
Office location:
124 Prospect Street (Brewster Hall) - Room 305. For directions, use
this link.
Office hours: Tuesdays 10am-12pm *By appointment only - see
the sign up sheet on my office door*
[Top]