This web-based syllabus is designed to be used throughout the
semester.
Below you will find links to the assignments for each of the 26 class
sessions
throughout the semester. Where possible, reading assignments have been
linked to electronic versions available on the Internet. Otherwise, the
assignment is available at the library
/Labrynth bookstore. Under the "materials"
section
of the class server, you will find the lecture notes for each session.
(I will post the notes at the beginning of the semester, but the notes
are subject to updates after each class session, depending on what we
cover
in class.)
Students visiting this page for the first time should read through the entire syllabus: the course description, the course requirements, the reading and the course outline. If you have any questions or comments about the web page or the course, please contact me.
[ Contact Instructor
] [ Contact Teaching Assistants
]
[ Course
description
] [ Requirements
] [ Reading
]
[ Course Outline ]
[ Books on reserve and
available
at Labyrinth Books ]
Important Dates:
Tuesday, Feb. 20: Short response due
Thursday, Mar. 29: Midterm Examination
Friday, April 27: Final Paper due by 4pm.
Students:
Submit papers in ELECTRONIC FORMAT using the "Drop Box" function
on the Classes*v2 server.
The electronic
version is due at 4 p.m.
May 8: Short Final Exam
at 2pm
LOCATION:
WHC, AUD; Tuesday, 8-May, 2:00PM-5:30PM
1. Introduction to comparative
politics
(1/16/07) (0 PAGES)
2. What is an explanation? (1/18/07) (0 required PAGES)
3. What is the key difference between democracy and
dictatorship?
(1/23/07) (40 PAGES)
4. Does "culture" explain democracy? (1/25/07) (20 PAGES)
5. Why do repressive elites sometimes take a chance on
democracy? (1/30/07) (30 PAGES)
6. Why do democracies emerge? (2/1/07) (45 PAGES)
7. What makes democracy endure? (2/6/07) (50 PAGES)
8. Why do democracies break down? (2/8/07) (50 PAGES)
9. Why do some groups organize more effectively than
others? (2/13/07) (45 PAGES)
10. Does cultural conflict preclude democracy?
(2/15/07) (25 PAGES)
11. How do political parties behave?
(2/20/07) (50 PAGES + skim additional article)
12. Why don't the rich soak the poor under democracy?
(2/22/07) (50 PAGES)
13. Does it matter when politicians ignore their
promises? Why do politicians impose unpopular policies? (2/27/07) (35 PAGES)
14. Why are policies so stable in some countries but they
change so often in others? (3/1/07) (35 PAGES)
15. How do domestic political
institutions impact the way a government behaves in the international
arena? (3/6/07) (50 PAGES)
16. What causes government corruption and what reforms
can be used to address it? (3/8/07) (50 PAGES)
17. How do dictatorships survive? (3/27/07) (50 PAGES)
18. ***Midterm examination*** (3/29/07)
19. Will economic development lead to the democratization
of China? (4/3/07) (35 PAGES)
20. Democracy vs. Dictatorship: Can voters control the
state under democracy?
(4/5/07) (50 PAGES)
21. How do communities and institutions shape each other? (4/10/07) (57 PAGES)
22. Do weak political institutions lead to civil war?
(4/12/07) (40 PAGES)
23. Why are there revolutions? (4/17/07) (35 PAGES)
24. Is there a logic to political violence?
(4/19/07) (50 PAGES)
25. Do democracies face commitment problems? (4/24/07) (0
PAGES)
26. Review (4/26/07) (0 PAGES)
[Top]
Course
description
This course introduces students to important concepts, themes, and
approaches in the comparative study of politics. Unlike other
sub-fields
of political science that have relatively well-defined areas of study
(e.g.,
American Politics, International Relations, History of Political
Thought,
Formal Theory), the range of Comparative Politics is broad. Some people
in Comparative Politics work on general questions such as, what are the
effects of democracy and dictatorship? Others work on specific
questions
such as, what is the role of religion in Indian political parties?
There
are also various methodologies employed in Comparative Politics,
including
case studies, small-n comparisons, and large-n statistical studies. The
field is united, however, by a commitment to test theories of political
phenomena using empirical examples from throughout the world.
The course is organized around questions that reflect both interesting phenomena and puzzles that call for some kind of explanation. We will examine some of the answers to these questions that have been proposed on the basis of comparative research. By the end of the course, the student will have acquired a broad perspective of the field of Comparative Politics and the ability to relate some of his or her own interests to existing concerns of other scholars.
Topics include democracy, dictatorship, the economic role of the
state, political parties
and
interest groups as well as questions of identity, ethnic conflict,
civil war, violence, and
revolution.
In addition to established classics in the field, we will also study
work-in-progress
so that students can see how research goes from formative stages to
final
published versions. Although the emphasis of the course is on
substance,
methodological issues will also be discussed. Special attention is paid
to the merits of a good explanation as well as questions of research
design.
What is an explanation? Keep this question in mind as we move through
the
different questions.
[Top]
(1) Participation in Section
(15%). Each section has a syllabus. See below.
(2) Short response paper (10%): Take any question we pose in class and critically evaluate an answer to it. Maximum 2 pages. (Due Tues., Feb. 20, 2007.)
(3) In-class Midterm examination (30%): Thurs., Mar. 29, 2007.
(4) Final paper (30%): Take
your short response (or another question if you prefer) and examine the
question more carefully.
Do further research, comparing different approaches and explanations.
Decide
what you think is the best explanation and why. Suggestion: Write the
paper
as a research proposal for your senior essay. The paper should
be 8
pages.
(Due: Friday, April 27, 2007.)
Students must
submit papers in ELECTRONIC FORMAT using the "Drop Box" function on the
Classes*v2 server.
The electronic
version will also be due at 4 p.m.
(5) Final Exam (15%): Tues,
May 8, 2007 (2pm). FINAL COVERS
LECTURES 17, 19-25.
LOCATION: WHC,
AUD; Tuesday, 8-May, 2:00PM-5:30PM
Reading
Students will be expected to read 30 to 60 pages per class. Besides
the required reading (in bold below), you will also find “recommended”
and “background” reading. This is not required. It is provided for
motivated
students who wish to explore various issues in greater depth. Also, it
may prove useful as additional research for class papers. Some readings
are available on-line. URLs are provided below. Other readings are
available on
reserve at the library and available for purchase at Labyrinth Books.
[Top]
1. Introduction to comparative politics (1/16/07)
What is “comparative politics”? Why compare? Review the questions
we will look at throughout the semester.
[Top]
2. What is
an
explanation? (1/18/07)
*Recommended* further reading:
Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1982. The Logic of Comparative
Inquiry. Malebar, Florida: Krieger Publishing. Pages 3-30.
***Book on reserve at CCL*** THIS IS *NOT* REQUIRED READING!
[Top]
3. What is the key difference between democracy
and dictatorship? (1/23/07)
REQUIRED: Przeworski, Adam,
Michael Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and
Fernando Limongi. 2000. Democracy and
Development: Political
Regimes
and Economic Well-being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge:
Cambridge
University Press.
CHAPTER 1
***Book available
at Labyrinth Books and on reserve at CCL***
(Basically the same content is also available here:
Alvarez,
Mike and José Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limongi, and Adam
Przeworski.
1996. “Classifying political regimes.” Studies in Comparative
International
Development 31: 3-34.
***Available on-line from EBSCOhost.***)
Recommended
Gurr, Robert Ted and Keith Jaggers. 1999. Polity 98 Project.
Available from http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/polity/
Kenneth A. Bollen. 1991. “Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps” in Alex Inkeles, ed., On Measuring Democracy: Its Consequences and Concomitants. New Brunswick: Transaction Books. Pages 3-20.
Freedom House. "Methodology." Freedom in the world: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties, 1998-1999.4. Does "culture" explain democracy?
(1/25/07)
REQUIRED: Seligson, Mitchell A.
2002. “The Renaissance of Political Culture or
the Renaissance of the Ecological Fallacy?” Comparative Politics
34: 273-292.
***Available on-line.***
5. Why do repressive elites sometimes take a
chance on democracy? (1/30/07)
REQUIRED: Wood, Elisabeth Jean.
20003. Forging Democracy from Below. New
York:
Cambridge University Press. CHAPTERS 1 & 8.
***Book
available at Labyrinth Books and on reserve at CCL***
[Top]
6. Why do democracies emerge? (2/1/07)
REQUIRED:
Huntington,
Samuel P. 1965. “Political Development and Political Decay.” World
Politics
17. Pages 386-430.
***Available on-line at
www.jstor.org***
Like Almond and Verba, Huntington notes a “fundamental shift in
values,
attitudes, and expectations” in democratic cultures. What force drives
this “shift”? Does Huntington share any common ground with Przeworski?
What are the foreign policy implications of Huntington’s argument?
[Top]
7. What makes democracy endure? (2/6/07)
REQUIRED:
Przeworski, Adam, Michael Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and
Fernando Limongi. 2000. Democracy
and Development: Political
Regimes
and Economic Well-being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge:
Cambridge
University Press.
CHAPTER 2
***Book available at Labyrinth Books
and on reserve at CCL***
(Similar content is also available here:
Przeworski,
Adam and Fernando Limongi. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” World
Politics 49. Pages 155-183.
Available on-line.)
Last session Huntington introduced us to a correlation between
per
capita income and democracy. He concludes that modernization leads to
democracy.
How do Przeworski et al. explain this correlation? What mechanism do
they
suggest causes democracies to emerge? Are the policy implications of
Przeworski
et al.’s argument different from Huntington’s?
[Top]
8. Why do democracies break down? (2/8/07)
REQUIRED:
Cohen, Youssef. 1994. Radicals,
Reformers, and Reactionaries: The
Prisoner's Dilemma and the Collapse of Democracy in Latin America.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pages 1-9, 38-75, 119-124.
***Book available at Labyrinth Books
and on reserve at CCL***
Last class we considered economic causes of democratic breakdown. This class we consider a political explanation, as Cohen introduces us to the prisoner’s dilemma, where two actors are unable to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome because of the incentive structure they face. Is Cohen’s explanation reconcilable with Przeworski et al.’s? Is one more general than the other? Are there “crucial” tests we could put to the two stories?
Recommended
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. Chapters 1 and 2.
[Top]
REQUIRED:
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press. Pages 5-52
***Book available at Labyrinth Books and on reserve at CCL***
How does Olson explain collective action? What role does culture play in Olson’s framework? Recall that Cohen introduced us to the prisoner’s dilemma. Since then, we have considered the collective action problems facing interest groups. Hardin (1982) argues that the logic of the prisoner’s dilemma is the same as that of collective action. Below is a list of readings on the collective action problem and its applications. Almost all of the readings are available on-line at www.jstor.org. You should read the abstracts of all available articles and read the entire articles of those that most interest you.
Bendor, Jonathan and Dilip Mookherjee. 1987. “Institutional Structure and the Logic of Ongoing Collective Action.” The American Political Science Review 81: 129-154.
Benvenisti, Eyal. 1996. “Collective Action in the Utilization of Shared Freshwater: The Challenges of International Water Resources Law.” American Journal of International Law 90: 384-415.
Crowley, Stephen. 1994. “Barriers to Collective Action: Steelworkers and Mutual Dependence in the Former Soviet Union.” World Politics 46: 589-615.
Gowa, Joanne. 1988. “Public Goods and Political Institutions: Trade and Monetary Policy Processes in the United States.” International Organization 42: 15-32.
Heckathorn, Douglas D. 1993. “Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary Provision Versus Selective Incentives.” American Sociological Review 58: 329-350.
Macy, Michael W. 1991. “Chains of Cooperation: Threshold Effects in Collective Action.” American Sociological Review 56: 730-747.
Muller, Edward N. and Karl-Dieter Opp. 1986. “Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action.” The American Political Science Review 80: 471-488.
Oliver, Pamela E. 1993. “Formal Models of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology 19: 271-300.
Oneal, John R. 1990. “The Theory of Collective Action and Burden Sharing in NATO.” International Organization 44: 379-402.
Sabia, Daniel R. 1988. “Rationality, Collective Action, and Karl Marx.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 50-71.
Uhlaner, Carole J. 1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 390-422.
Also recommended
Austen-Smith. 1981. “Voluntary Pressure Groups.” Economica 48.
Pages 143-53.
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1996. “Madison’s Dilemma.” The Interest Group Society. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Pages 1-15.
Becker, Gary S. 1983. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98. Pages 371-400.
Denzau, Arthur T. and Michael C. Munger. 1986. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80. Pages 89-106.
Hardin, Garret. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162. Pages 1243-1248.
Sen, Amartya, Nicholas Stern, and Joseph Stiglitz. 1991. “Development Strategies: The Roles of the State and the Private Sector.” Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington DC: The World Bank. Pages 421-435.
10. Does cultural
conflict preclude democracy? (2/15/07)
REQUIRED: Kalyvas,
Stathis N. 1998. “Democracy and Religious Politics: Evidence From
Belgium.”
Comparative
Political Studies 31. Pages 292-320.
***Available on-line from EBSCOhost.***
Recall that cultural explanations of the survival of democracy
were
not supported by statistical evidence. Rather, the data indicate that
economic
explanations take precedence. But can democracy really survive in a
culture
hostile to democratic values? Kalyvas examines an analytically
significant
case – 19th century Belgium – to show that democratic institutions can
survive based on material self-interest, even when cultural values
oppose
the principles of democracy.
[Top]
***Tuesday, Feb. 20: Short response due***
11. How
do political parties behave? (2/20/07)
REQUIRED:
Downs, Anthony. An Economic
Theory of Democracy. New York:
Harper
Collins Publishers. Pages 36-50, 114-141.
***Book available at Labyrinth Books
and on reserve at CCL***
REQUIRED
- but only SKIM!!! Cox,
Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral
Systems.”
American
Journal of Political Science 34. Pages 903-35.
***Available on-line at www.jstor.org***
12. Why don't the rich soak the poor under
democracy? (2/22/07)
REQUIRED: Scheve, Kenneth and
David Stasavage. 2006. Religion and Preferences
for Social Insurance. Quarterly
Journal of Political Science Vol. 1 No.
3:255-86.
***Available On-line.***
REQUIRED:
De La O, Ana and Jonathan Rodden. 2006. Does Religion Distract the
Poor? Income and Issue Voting around the World. Presented at the Annual
Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April.
***Available On-line.***
13. Does it matter when politicians
ignore their promises? Why do
politicians impose unpopular policies? (2/27/07)
REQUIRED:
Stokes Susan C., 2001. Mandates and Democracy. New York: Cambridge
University Press. CHAPTERS 1 & 7.
***Book available at Labyrinth
Books and on reserve at CCL***
[Top]
14. Why
are
policies so stable in some countries but they change so often in
others? (3/1/07)
REQUIRED:
Tsebelis,
George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems.” British
Journal
of Political Science 25: 289-326.
***Available on-line at
www.jstor.org***
[Top]
15. How do
domestic political institutions impact the way a government behaves in
the international arena? (3/6/07)
This class will examine areas considered to be in the
sub-fields
of both International Relations and Comparative Politics. Students
should be aware that there is increasing overlap between these
fields.
REQUIRED:
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic
Development. New York:
Cambridge University
Press. Chapter 3.
***Book available at Labyrinth Books and on reserve at CCL***
16. What causes government corruption and what
reforms can be used to
address it? (3/8/07)
REQUIRED: Rose-Ackerman,
Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government. New York:
Cambridge University Press. CHAPTERS 8, 9.
***Book available at Labyrinth
Books and on reserve at CCL***
[Top]
***Spring Break***
17. How do
dictators survive? (3/27/07)
REQUIRED:
Ramseyer, J. Mark and
Frances
McCall Rosenbluth. 1998. The Politics of Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge
University Press. CHAPTERS 1, 11.
***Book available at Labyrinth Books
and on reserve at CCL***
19.
Will economic
development lead to the democratization of China? (4/3/07)
READING:
REQUIRED:
Landry, Pierre. 2005.
Administrative Conflicts in China: Initiation, Escalation and
Resolution. Ms. Department of Political Science, Yale University.
***Available On-line.***
20. Democracy vs. Dictatorship: Can voters control the state under democracy? (4/5/07)
REQUIRED: Rosendorff,
B. Peter and James Raymond Vreeland. 2006.
Democracy and Data Dissemination: The Effect of Political
Regime on Transparency.
Ms.
***Available On-line.***
REQUIRED:
Mani,
Anandi and Sharun W. Mukand. 2000. “Democracy and the Politics of
Visibility.”
Prepared for the Leitner Conference on the Political Economy of
Development,
Yale University. March 16-18.
***Available On-line.***
Recommended
Przeworski, Adam. 1997. “The State in a Market Economy.” In Joan M.
Nelson, Charles Tilly, and Lee Walker: Transforming Post-Communist
Political
Economies. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Pages 411-431.
21. How do
communities and institutions shape each other? (4/10/07)
REQUIRED:
Sawyer, Mark Q. 2006. Racial Politics in Post-Revolutionary Cuba.
Cambridge University Press. Chapters 2 & 3.
***Book available at Labyrinth Books and on reserve at CCL***
REQUIRED:
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. New York:
Verso.
Pages 1-7, 36-46 (Be sure to read the last two paragraphs of Chapter
2).
***Book available at Labyrinth Books and on reserve at CCL***
This class we explore the question of identity. Chapter 5 of the Sawyer book is highly recommended further reading for those interested in interview findings about race and daily life in the Spanish Caribbean.
Recommended
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Any.
Lloyd, S. A. 1992. Ideals As Interests in Hobbes's Leviathan:
The
Power of Mind over Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Do weak political institutions lead to civil war? (4/12/07)
REQUIRED: Hegre,
Havard, Tanja Ellingsen, Scott Gates, and
Nils Petter Gleditsch. 2001. “Toward a Democratic Civil Peace?
Democracy,
Political Change, and Civil War, 1816-1992.” American Political
Science
Review 95: 33-48.
***Available
at http://journals.cambridge.org***
23. Why are there
revolutions? (4/17/07)
REQUIRED:
Goodwin,
Jeff. 1994. “Toward a new sociology of revolutions.” Theory
and Society 23/6: 731-766.
***Available on-line at
www.jstor.org***
We turn to a difficult subject: revolutions. How do we define revolution? What different approaches have been used to address the question?
Background
Aya, Rod. 1990. Rethinking revolutions and collective violence:
studies on concept, theory, and method. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
Goldstone, Jack. 1991. “An Analytical Framework.” In Jack Goldstone, Ted Gurr and Farrokh Moshiri (eds.): Revolutions of the Late Twentieth Century. Westview Press.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: a Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press: 3-43, 285-293.
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research” in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol (eds.): Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 3-37.
Taylor, Michael. 1988. “Rationality and Revolutionary Collective Action.” In Michael Taylor (ed.), Rationality and Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 63-97.
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution.
Addison-Wesley.
[Top]
24. Is there a logic to political violence?
(4/19/07)
REQUIRED:
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New
York: Cambridge University Press. PAGES: 16-31, 195-209.
[Top]
25. Do democracies
face commitment problems? (4/24/07)
What is a “time inconsistent preference” problem? Do democracies
face this kind of a problem? If so, how can they address the problem?
In
what other situations do we observe this kind of dilemma?
[Top]
26. Review (4/26/07)
[Top]
***Friday, April 27, 2007: Final Paper due by
4pm.***
***Location: 124 Prospect Street***
Books on reserve and
available
at the Labyrinth Books:
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined
Communities. New York: Verso.
Cohen, Youssef. 1994. Radicals, Reformers, and Reactionaries: the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Collapse of Democracy in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, Mark Q. 2006. Racial Politics in Post-Revolutionary Cuba.
Cambridge University Press.
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, Michael Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub,
and
Fernando Limongi. 2000. Democracy
and Development: Political Regimes
and
Economic Well-being in the World, 1950-1990. New York:
Cambridge
University
Press.
Ramseyer, J. Mark and Frances McCall Rosenbluth. 1998. The Politics
of Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Stokes Susan C., 2001. Mandates and Democracy. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 20003. Forging Democracy from Below. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
RECOMMENDED (but not available at Labrynth):
Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1982. The Logic of Comparative
Inquiry.
Malebar, Florida: Krieger Publishing.
(Of particular interest for students interested in the philosophy of
science.)
Contact Instructor:
James Raymond Vreeland
Associate Professor, Department
of Political Science
email: james.vreeland@yale.edu
web: http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/jrv24/
tel: 203-432-6220
Office hours: Tuesday afternoons (2-4pm)
Office location:
124 Prospect Street, Room 305. Click here for directions.
[Top]